Land ownership is based on violence
May 11th, 2011Let’s face it - land can only be “owned” by violence.
If you come onto land that I own, I can kick you off, or I can call the police or even shoot you. How did this system come to be? and who does it serve?
All other things that we possess are produced with some element of labour, and so can be traded on that basis. It took me two hours to make this basket, so you pay me instead of having to make it yourself. When we buy services we pay for labour even more directly.
But land is different because nobody made it. The land was always here, and there was a time when none of it was “owned” by anyone. So what changed?
When hunter gatherers became agriculturalists, populations increased relative to the amount of land under cultivation. More and more land would have been turned into farmland until there was no more spare fertile land. In some cases this led to population pressure and even collapse (Such as with the Maya, the Greenland Norse, and even modern Rwanda - See Jared Diamond’s book ‘Collapse’).
When a society runs out of spare fertile land, each farmer must then compete with the others to ensure that they have access to enough land to feed themselves and their families. In other words land becomes scarce.
One way of ensuring dominance when in competition is violence. Once upon a time, one of these early farmers must have decided that only he and his family were allowed to cultivate a certain patch. The rest is inevitable - violence, war, feudalism, peasant revolts and an ongoing struggle between those who have enough and those who don’t.
When colonial Europeans came to new parts of the word that didn’t have individual land ownership laws (Africa, New Zealand, Australia etc.) they quickly imposed such laws, with them as the major beneficiaries. How did they impose these laws? You guessed it, well documented and often horrific violence.
Individual land ownership is something most westerners think of as civilized and normal. I argue that it is in fact a fabricated concept that disguises domination of scarce land by those sanctioned to impose violence on others - usually the rich.
By dominating all land with violence, the rich do more than limit our opportunity to take pleasant strolls - they force us to serve them in order to pay tribute (or rent).
The structures and laws around land ownership haven’t changed greatly since the end of Feudalism.
Until they do, this reality won’t change either.























































